There are two broad ways of dealing with conflict:
· It may be directly resolved between the parties by:
violence
power manipulation
mutual avoidance
negotiation (perhaps with the assistance of others = mediation)
· A third party neutral may judge or intervene to impose a solution by:
adjudication
arbitration
expert appraisal
litigation
Refer to the “Mediation” page of this website for a description of some of the many ways of resolving disputes. Processes other than litigation are collectively described as ADR (Alternative – or appropriate – Dispute Resolution).
Wherever there is a potential for conflict or differences of opinion, it is prudent to pre-arrange a process to resolve it. This is as much for peace of mind and mutual interest of the parties as for efficiency and financial prudence. Most standard construction contracts and conditions of engagement so provide.
Colin R Orchiston is
involved in construction disputes as follows:
· negotiation and mediation: acting as mediator to facilitate the exchange of views, identify the issues, evolve potential resolutions, move the parties away from conflict and towards agreed outcomes, and arrange for the documentation of those outcomes so that they can be acted upon and/or enforced.
· arbitration and adjudication: acting as an industry-experienced independent arbitrator to receive, sift, and test the evidence, and to formulate a reasoned decision that decides the issue.
· expert appraisal: providing independent and experienced analysis and reporting on technical and/or industry-specific issues.
· litigation: assisting legal representatives to identify and prioritise technical and/or industry-specific issues; assessing and analysing causative actions leading to damages claims, and advising on appropriate responses during litigation preparation.
Steps towards resolving a
dispute
· Does the dispute arise out of a contract or other agreement? If so, then that agreement should have provisions for dispute resolution that must be followed. If those provisions include for procedures to appoint someone to issue a formal decision, or to arbitrate, adjudicate or mediate, then follow those procedures. If you think that you might be better positioned by going through the Courts instead of using the dispute resolution procedures in the contract, then that may not be possible unless the other party agrees to that variation to the contract.
· Is the contract or agreement “informal”? If the drawings and/or specifications and/or contract terms are not clear, then it becomes more difficult to sort things out. It is likely that you will need an someone with both a legal and technical experience (most likely an architect or engineer, or possibly a quantity surveyor) to sort it out. However, the Construction Contracts Act sets out minimum mandatory conditions of contract.
· Is it a construction contract? The provisions of the Construction Contracts Act apply to all NZ construction contracts, and cannot be contracted out of. The Act has provisions for the resolution of disputes, which are described elsewhere on this website. Note however, that if a particular construction contract does have dispute resolution provisions, you can also follow the adjudication procedures in the Construction Contracts Act, instead of, or in parallel with them.
· Seek expert advice – early: I often see disputes which have festered to the point that resolution becomes unnecessarily difficult. It is far cheaper to get the right advice at the outset, and then to communicate your concerns to the other party in a factual way. Sometimes just finding out “where the other side is at”, and discussing how their actions impact on you in ways which they may not have appreciated, is enough to deal with the issue. Regrettably, dispute resolution is too-often seen as the end of the line after much expense in preparation; whereas an early intervention by an expert or mediator may have avoided an impending dispute altogether.
· Serve notice of a dispute: That will normally be a requirement under the contract: if so, follow the provisions carefully. If not, then it is obviously sensible anyway! A dispute about whether there is a dispute, is, of course, a dispute!
· Are you a builder? If you are in dispute over non-payment of an invoice, then the provisions of the Construction Contracts Act require you to have served your Payment Claim in a specific way – or at least to set out specific information. In the case of a residential project, that includes serving a copy of “Form 1” of the Act. If you haven’t met those requirements, then go back and start again: re-issue the invoice properly, and then use the provisions of the Act to pursue recovery after the (new) time for payment has passed.
·
Are you a house owner/occupier? If so, the arbitration provisions of the
contract (if any) may not apply:
Unless you signed a specific agreement to waive your rights not to
participate in arbitration, then you still have those rights: i.e. you can decline to participate in
the arbitration. However, our view
is that the arbitration provisions in a contract are a sound fair and effective
way of resolving disputes, and we recommend that you agree to arbitration. Whether or not you agree, you cannot
avoid being involved in adjudication if served with a notice that you are a
party to one arising out of a construction contract.
· Preparing for the dispute: Read the pages on this website about arbitration, and/or the Construction Contracts Act, and/or Mediation, whichever is appropriate. Then read the pages on this website about Preparing for Disputes.
·
Appoint an arbitrator/mediator/adjudicator: See below for more
details. Once appointed, the
arbitrator/mediator/adjudicator will plan and manage the dispute resolution
process, setting timeframes and procedures as may be
appropriate.
Appointing an
arbitrator/mediator/adjudicator
· If the terms of the contract provide an appointment procedure, follow it
· If not, then, it is usually helpful to agree an appointment with the other party if that is possible: a sensible course would be to provide the other party with a list of three names which you are happy with, and ask them to choose one within a specific timeframe. Lists of suitable persons are available on the AMINZ website.
· Otherwise, you might at least agree to appoint someone else (e.g. the president of AMINZ or of NZIA or some other appropriate body) to make the appointment.
· For a dispute under the Construction Contracts Act, you can ask AMINZ to appoint an adjudicator, for which they will charge a fee. The Arbitration Act also sets out the default procedures for the appointment of an arbitrator.
· If you ring a prospective arbitrator/adjudicator, be aware that they will not want to discuss the issues in dispute any more than is necessary for them to understand whether they can accept an appointment for the dispute or not. They will also be unlikely to be able to give an indication of their costs except on a daily or hourly rate. It is usual for them to seek some security for their fees before accepting an appointment, and for an arbitration/adjudication decision to be released only on settlement of their fees.
· The AMINZ (Arbitrators and Mediators Institute of NZ) also has helpful advice on managing disputes, the appointment of an arbitrator/mediator/adjudicator, and the standard protocols for appointment and for the conduct of disputes.
These notes are provided by Orchiston Architects Ltd, Architecture & Dispute Resolution, P.O. Box 9136 Wellington, ph 04 5627 438, based on information as at 20/08/06. They remain the copyright of Orchiston Architects Ltd, and may be copied and redistributed if and only if reproduced in full without any change in content whatsoever to the notes, letterhead/logo, and this footer. They are intended as a general guide only, and not specific advice: the author accepts no responsibility for persons acting or not acting upon the information herein, and specific advice should be sought from the author or other suitable professional in respect of particular issues as and when required.